Get Started with ixamBee
Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
The logic followed here is: (2nd number – 1st number) + 5 = 3rd number (19, 42, 28) → (42 – 19) + 5 = 23 + 5 = 28 (11, 39, 33) → (39 – 11) + 5 = 28 + 5 = 33 By checking options, (25, 37, 19) → (37 – 25) + 5 = 12 + 5 = 17 ≠ 19 (21, 43, 28) → (43 – 21) + 5 = 22 + 5 = 27 ≠ 28 (20, 58, 43) → (58 – 20) + 5 = 38 + 5 = 43 (23, 55, 36) → (55 – 23) + 5 = 32 + 5 = 37 ≠ 36 Hence, correct answer is (C).
A magistrate may not remand the accused to police custody for
Which of the following is not required for the liability of a master to arise for a servant's actions?
Which of the statement is correct relating to Article 32 of the Constitution of India?
What does the legal maxim Qui Facit Per Alium Facit Per Se imply in the context of the law of agency?
As oer the According to the the Central Vigilance Commission Act the ____________________ may make rules with respect to the number of members of the st...
As per section 167 of the Companies Act, 2013, the office of a director shall become vacant in which of the following cases?
(a) Disqualified un...
In Section 2(10) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the definition of gender now encompasses ________________.
In computing the period of limitation for filing a suit the day on which it is reckoned ______.
When a fact is said to be “Not proved” as per Indian Evidence Act?
When a suit has been duly instituted, within what time frame can a summons be issued to the defendant to appear and answer the claim?
