According to the statement I which implies that climate activist should reach government representatives to resolve issues pertaining to climate is the correct course of action. Statement III also poses a positive course of action which suggests climate activist to volunteer with local organisations in order to bring changes. Statement II however is negative in connotation and is contrary as it suggests that climate activist must sympathise with stakeholders that pose destruction or danger to climate. Therefore only statement I and III are correct answers.
Why did the other judges possibly revolt against the CJI according to the passage?
What did the black dogs do when the author and his friends came closer to them?
How, according to the passage, did African countries transform themselves from unattractive to popular tourist destinations?
What factors have had deleterious impacts on the ability of tank systems in Sri Lanka to sustain local ecosystems and combat drought?
I. Heigh...
Why were all the judges who revolted, were upset with the CJI?
Who was Iswaran?
What does the line “it’s amazing to see what we can ….......... as a community” mean with regard to the passage?
What danger is mentioned in the passage?
Choose the word which is the most opposite in meaning to the word ‘vested’ as used in the passage.
Which of the following is a near antonym of the word ‘skeptical’?