Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Combined Inequality: C ≤ S < R, U > R ≥ Z Decoded conclusion: I. Z ≥ C II. U > S III. U ≤ C C ≤ S < R ≥ Z No relationship can be established between Z and C. Hence conclusion I is not true. C ≤ S < R < U U > S. Hence conclusion II is true . C ≤ S < R < U U > C. Hence conclusion III is not true
Professional communications between a client and his attorney are protected :
Private person may arrest any person who in his presence commits ?
Article 14 of Constitution of India is related to
In which situation can a court order the attachment of the property of a judgment debtor?
Under the provisions of Code 76 of the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020, what happens if a worker is entitled to more favo...
Under the Companies Act what is the notice period for the purpose of calling a Board meeting which should be sent in writing to every director at his ad...
Where a judgement-debtor has, by fraud or force, prevented the execution of a decree or order within the period of limitation, the court may, on the app...
The question is whether A committed a crime at Mumbai on a certain day. The fact that on that day, A was at Trivandrum is relevant
As per the Motor Vehicles Act, Death of insured-
According to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act which of the following is incorrect with respect to an Arbitration Agreement?