given statements: M $ K; K & N, N % R, R @ W After converting: M ≥ K, K > N, N ≤ R, R < W After combining: M ≥ K > N ≤ R < W Conclusion a → W & K → W > K There is no relation between W and K in the statement M ≥ K > N ≤ R < W so, it is not true. Conclusion b → K & W → K > W There is no relation between K and W in the statement M ≥ K > N ≤ R < W. So, it is not true. Conclusion c → M % R → M ≤ R There is no relation between M and R in the statement M ≥ K > N ≤ R < W. So, it is not true.
Assume that there are equal numbers of male and female students in a university. Of all male students, 10 per cent major in economics; and of ...
Which of the following is a key objective of India's New Industrial Policy 2019-2024?
For Ram, coarse rice is an inferior good. This means
then the number of pure strategy Nash Eq...
Which of the following functions has a degree of homogeneity not equal to unity?
In the standard IS-LM model, an increase in Government spending (G) without changing taxes has
If elasticity is ‘e’, and price of the product is B, MR=?
Of 10 computer chips, 4 are defective. What is the probability of selecting 3 without replacement, only one of which is defective?
Which of the following is not correct?
Economists generally believe that making assumptions is