Statements: M $ K; K & N, N % R, R @ W
Conclusions:
I. W & K
II. K & W
III. M % R
given statements: M $ K; K & N, N % R, R @ W After converting: M ≥ K, K > N, N ≤ R, R < W After combining: M ≥ K > N ≤ R < W Conclusion a → W & K → W > K There is no relation between W and K in the statement M ≥ K > N ≤ R < W so, it is not true. Conclusion b → K & W → K > W There is no relation between K and W in the statement M ≥ K > N ≤ R < W. So, it is not true. Conclusion c → M % R → M ≤ R There is no relation between M and R in the statement M ≥ K > N ≤ R < W. So, it is not true.
How much deduction under section 80TTA of Income Tax Act is allowed?
Which of the following is not considered as a Current Liability?
A long contract requires that the investor
As per Income Tax Act, Children education allowance is exempt upto?
If Selling Price is 9 per unit, variable cost is 5 per unit and fixed cost is 100000, calculate PV ratio?
Which of the following is not a Subsidiary Book in Accounting?
As an auditor you came across a situation where related party transactions have taken place. Which AS deals with it?
As per Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013, long term provisions are shown –
Which of the below import duties would be imposed?
Which of the following statements about the accrual basis of accounting is true?