Question
Statements: A ≥ B > C < D, E ≥ F ≥ G, D = H ≥
E Conclusion: I. B > F II. D ≥ G III. C < G In the question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the following conclusion(s) among the three conclusions is/are true and then give your answer accordingly.Solution
A ≥ B > C < D = H ≥ E ≥ F ≥ G                   No relationship can be established between B and F. Hence conclusion I is not true. A ≥ B > C < D = H ≥ E ≥ F ≥ G                   D ≥ G. Hence conclusion II is true. A ≥ B > C < D = H ≥ E ≥ F ≥ G                   No relationship can be established between C and G. Hence conclusion III is not true.
The ratio of difference between the present age of A and B to the present age of B and C is 6:1. 6 years hence, the ratio between the age of A and C is ...
The cost price per kg of sugar types 'X' and 'Y' is Rs. 80 and Rs. 150 respectively. These are blended to form a mixture which is sold at Rs. 184 per kg...
Abhinav bought some pencils for ₹ X. He sold 20% of pencils at 25% loss, one third at 20% profit and the remaining at 25% profit. If the total profit ...
A shopkeeper sold a jacket for Rs. 2400 at a loss of 40%. At what price should he have sold the jacket, to earn a profit of 30%?
Marked price of an article is Rs.320 more than its cost price. If profit earned is equal to the discount given then find the profit earned?
A reduction of 20% in the price of rice enables a customer to purchase 125 kg more for Rs.8,000. What is the original price of rice
- An article has a cost price of Rs. 750 and is marked 40% above its cost price. 'A' proposes to sell this article after two successive discounts of 12% and ...
If there is a loss of 25% on selling the article at 15/28 of the original selling price then what will be the percentage profit after selling the articl...
A trader marked an article 35% above its cost price and sold it after allowing a discount of 25%. If the transaction resulted in a profit of Rs. 20, the...
A shopkeeper sold a jacket for Rs. 3500 at a loss of 30%. At what price should he have sold the jacket, to earn a profit of 25%?