Given statements: K < L; M = N; L > O ≥ M On combining: L > O ≥ M = N; K < L Conclusions: I. K < M → False (as K < L, L > O and O ≥ M → there is no clear relation between K and M) II. O = N → False (as O ≥ M = N → O ≥ N) Hence, none of the given conclusion is true.
Which of the following is an exception to the doctrine of privity of contract rule _______________?
As per the Motor Vehicles Act, a motorcycle with an engine capacity not exceeding 50cc may be driven in a public place by a person after attaining what ...
In criminal cases the fact that the person accused is of good character
Section 114 of Evidence Act provides for which of the following?
What is the punishment for tampering with computer source documents under section 65 of the Information Technology Act, 2000?
According to the principle of marshalling by a subsequent purchaser, if an owner mortgages two or more properties to one person and later sells one or m...
Which section of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the penalty for violation of any section or rules for which no specific penalty is defined?
An “unlawful assembly” is one where the common object of the persons composing that assembly is___________________
A is accused of murder. He alleges that by grave and sudden provocation he was deprived of the power of self-control. B denies this fact
The establishment, recognition and application of common sanitary and phytosanitary measures by Members is called
