Given statements: K < L; M = N; L > O ≥ M On combining: L > O ≥ M = N; K < L Conclusions: I. K < M → False (as K < L, L > O and O ≥ M → there is no clear relation between K and M) II. O = N → False (as O ≥ M = N → O ≥ N) Hence, none of the given conclusion is true.
He was the second speaker for the evening, and spoke to 111 people.
The novel's protagonist was a disaffected young man, struggling to find his place in the world.
Directions : In the question below, two sentences with one word in each highlighted in bold. From the options, choose the one that can replace the hig...
Each question consists of four sentences and some sentences are grammatically incorrect or inappropriate. Read each sentence to find out the error in t...
Choose the antonym of the word PRAGMATISM
Select the most appropriate ANTONYM of the highlighted word.
The wise man tried to pacify both the warring parties, but they were hell bent ...
Directions : In the question below, two sentences with one word in each highlighted in bold. From the options, choose the one that can replace the high...
The President the aspirations of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes/(P) with political parties, industry and other bodies/(Q) revealed that t...
Expensive oil could hit consumption and public investment and dent private investment (what is not a path) to a sustained revival.
Inference- Gaining knowledge is important than how much you score.
I. In education, two things are important – domain knowledge and soft ski...
