Statement: P = O ≥ N ≥ Y < M < W ≥ X; Y > Z
Conclusion:
I. Z ≥ X
II. P > Z
Given statement: P = O ≥ N ≥ Y < M < W ≥ X; Y > Z Conclusion: I) Z ≥ X → False (as Z < Y < M < W ≥ X → clear relation between Z and X cannot be determined) II) P > Z → True (as P = O ≥ N ≥ Y > Z → P > Z) Hence, only conclusion II is true
Section 82 of IPC provides that nothing is an offence which is done by a child under:
What happens to suits and applications, including those under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, related to a commercial dispute of a Specified...
The term Money-Laundering is defined under section________ of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002
An admission is a-
What is the right of foreclosure?
Vicarious liability of the Director of Company for dishonor of Cheque has been laid down in which of the following cases?
In a case involving the alleged murder of B by A, which of the following facts are relevant under Section 7 of Indian Evidence Act?
A person shall not be guilty of contempt of court for ________________ as laid down under the Contempt of Court Act
Where any asset reconstruction company or any person fails to comply with any direction issued by the Reserve Bank under this Act the adjudicating auth...
Every appeal to the Appellate Tribunal under section 53(B) shall be filed within a period of _________ from the date on which a copy of the direction o...
