Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
The given statement is: C1 < L1 > I2 = E1 ≥ N2 > T1 Conclusion-I: I2 > T1 From the statement, we can see that I2 = E1, and E1 ≥ N2 > T1. Therefore, I2 > T1 is logically correct. Hence, conclusion I is logical. Conclusion-II: T1 < C1 From the statement, we can see that C1 < L1 > I2. However, there is no direct relation between C1 and T1. Therefore, we cannot conclude that T1 < C1. Hence, conclusion II is not logical. Therefore, the only conclusion that is logical is I. Hence, the correct answer is option (A).
Directions: In each of the questions, a sentence has been divided into four parts, one of which may contain an error. Identify that fragment and mark ...
Directions: In each of the questions, a sentence has been divided into four parts, one of which may contain an error. Identify that fragment and mark ...
One of the players against (A)/whom an alleviation was made, (B)/an England international, is (C)/understood to be claiming he has an alibi (D).
The recent legal dispute over the (A)/ Future deal seems to be setting the stage (B)/ for a major fight between two (C)/ of the richest men in the wor...
Read the following sentence carefully and identify if there is any grammatical error in it. If you find any error, choose the part (A, B, C, or D) cont...
In the question given below, a sentence is given, divided into parts. One of the parts may contain an error. Identify the part that contains the error, ...
"This question consists of a sentence which is divided into four parts numbered (1) to 4. only one part of the sentence is not acceptable in standard w...
In each of the following sentences, a sentence is divided into 4 parts (A), (B), (C) and (D). Find out the error in these parts if any.
...The Statesman has the (A)/ larger circulation (B)/ of all English details (C)/ No Error (D).
The leeward side of Sirumalai hills arean unique ecosystems that receiving optimum rain and shine.