Question
Statement : During a one day match, Australian fielder
Labuschagne was observed not obeying one of the many recent changes implemented by the ICC, the one that no longer allows 'fake fielding' antics on the field. Courses of Action: I. Labuschagne should be penalised for disobedience. II. Labuschagne should be barred from playing the next match. In the questions below are given a statement followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. A course of action is a step or administrative decision to be taken for improvement, follow-up or further action in regard to the problem, policy, etc. On the basis of the information given in the statement to be true, then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing.Solution
Since the player has shown disobedience, he should be penalised thus I follows. Any extreme action should be avoided while taking a course of action unless it is the only option left. Thus, II does not follow.
Which of the following constitutional body in India is responsible for the conduct of elections?
On application under section 22-E of The Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001, Court fee shall be payable:-
Provision for award of cost is provided in which of the following Sections of Code of Civil Procedure?
The Commissioner of Food Safety for the State under Food Safety and Standards Act is appointed by
President makes an oath in the presence of …….
Investigation under the PC Act can be conducted by officers not below which rank?
Every suit instituted, appeal preferred, and application made after the prescribed period shall be dismissed-
Which of the following statements is correct?
When is there an abuse of dominant position as per the Competition Act?
Which of the following is NOT a condition under which the provisions of this Sanhita apply extraterritorially according to Section 1(5)?