Continue with your mobile number
From Statement I: We have: Only two person sits between W and X. W sits at left end. Only one person sits between Y and X, who doesn’t sit with W, that means Y sits second to right of X. O sits third to right of M, neither of them sits adjacent to X or Y. Only three person sits between O and Z, who doesn’t sit adjacent to Y, that means O sits at extreme right end. At least two person sits between Y and N, who neither sits adjacent to O nor W, that means we have two different case, in case (1) N sits left of Y, in case (2) N sits right of Y. Based on above given information we have: Case-1 Clearly, only six person sits between W and N. Hence, statement II alone sufficient.
A company shall not, at any time, vary the terms of a contract referred to in the prospectus or objects for which the prospectus was issued, except subj...
Who has the power to impose restrictions on trade, commerce and intercourse between one state and another in public interest?
Mark the incorrect statement:
The following essential ingredients need to prove the guilt of an accused by circumstantial evidence______.
The case Badruddin Rukonddim Karpude v. State of Maharashtra relates to_____.
Fundamental duty as added to the constitution by 86th Amendment deals with providing education to one’s child/ ward ________
How should wages be paid according to the Code on Wages?
Promises which form the consideration or part of the consideration for each other are called________.
Evidence may be given in any suit or proceeding
The incorporation document shall consist of a statement of an advocate, CA or CS that the LLP has complied with all the provisions of LLP act, person ma...
“Right to constitutional remedies” is provided under which Part of the Constitution of India?