Seven persons namely – Reena, Heena, Gautam, Ziyana, Hari, Rohit and Jyoti are sitting in a row not necessary in same order in such a way that some are facing north while others are facing south. Reena sits third to left of Hari, either of them sits at end of the row and Rohit sits immediate left of Reena. Rohit sits second to left of Ziyana, who is facing south. How many person sits facing south?
I. Person sitting immediate neighbor of Ziyana sits fourth to right of Jyoti. Person sitting at end of the row sits facing in opposite direction and Gautam sits third from right end. Hari faces north direction.
II. Person sitting immediate left of Rohit sits fourth to right of Jyoti and Gautam sits second to left of Hari.
We have: Reena sits third to left of Hari, either of them sits at end of the row, which means we get two possibilities, in case (1) Hari sits facing north at right end and in case (2) Reena sits at extreme left end. Rohit sits immediate left of Reena and Rohit sits second to left of Ziyana, who sits facing south, that means case (2) is not valid, in case (1a) Reena sits facing south and in case (1b) Reena sits facing north. Based on above given information we get: From I: We have: Person sitting immediate neighbor of Ziyana sits fourth to right of Jyoti, which means Jyoti must sits facing south. Person sitting at end of the row sits facing in opposite direction, which means person at left end sits facing south. Gautam sits third from right end, which means case (1a) is not valid. Based on above given information, we have following result: Case1a Gautam sits third from right end, this condition is not satisfied so rejected. Since, direction facing of Heena, Rohit and Gautam is not known, thus we can’t determine required result. Hence, statement I is not sufficient. From II: We have: Person sitting immediate left of Rohit sits fourth to right of Jyoti, which means in case (1a) Rohit sits facing south and in case (1b) Rohit sits facing north. Gautam sits second to left of Hari, which means case (1a) is not valid. Based on above given information, we get following result: Case-1b Since, direction of Heena and Gautam is not known, thus result can’t be determined. Hence, statement I and II together are not sufficient.
On which date, did Sohan retire?
I. Sohan retired on the even numbered date out of the two dates falling exactly in the middle of the two two-dig...
How is LETTER written in the code language?
I. MASTER is written as NZHGVI
II. BOTTLE is written as YLGGOV
Which direction Mita is facing?
Statement I: Mita started walking from point P.
Statement II: She took two consecutive right turns...
Eight boxes M, N, O, P, Q, R, S and T are kept one above the other, such that the bottommost box is numbered as 1, the box above it is numbered as 2 and...
How is R related to O?
I. O is wife of E. O and K are the only children of T. I is the only daughter of E. R is the grand-daughter of T.
I...
Seven persons T, U, V, W, X, Y and Z are living in seven different floors. Ground floor is numbered as one and the above floor is numbered as two and s...
Seven persons A, B, C, D, M, N and O live on different floors of a seven storey building. The bottommost floor is numbered 1 and the topmost floor is n...
Given below is a question followed by two statements numbered I and II, each containing some information. Decide which of the statement(s) is/are suffic...
In a certain code, if ‘5 6’ means ‘that ball’, what do ‘5’ and ‘6’ mean respectively in that code?
Statement I:‘4 6 9’ ...
J, K, L, M and N are sitting around a circular table, facing the centre. Who is on the immediate left of L?
I. J sits between K and N. L is on th...