Question
Six persons M, N, Q, W, T and Y are arranged according
to their height. Find the second shortest person. I) M is taller than T but shorter than W. N is taller than Q and Y. Only two persons are shorter than T. W is not the tallest. Q is not the shortest. II) More than two persons are taller than Q. W is taller than M and T. Y is shorter than Q. N is taller than M. Each of the questions given below consists of a question and two statements numbered I and II given below it. You have to decide whether the data provided in the statements are sufficient to answer the question or not. Read both the statements and answer the question.Solution
We will analyse both these statements separately. I. As per this statement arrangement will look like this: N>W>M>T>Q>Y So from this arrangement we can conclude that Q is the second shortest person. II. As per this statement, we can conclude that: W>M & T Q>Y N>M From this arrangement we can conclude that who is the second shortest person. So this option will get eliminated individually
An absconder’s property is sold after how many months after attachment of his property?
...The doctrine of election and apportionment are laid down in which of the following Section of the Transfer of Property Act. 1882 ________.
Evidence in the proceedings of 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 shall be recorded in the manner:-
A is accused of murder of B by pistol alleged to by purchased on 10 August at Lucknow. A makes statement that on 10 August he was at Bhopal not at Luckn...
The Court shall take Judicial Notice of certain facts. Which of the following facts is not included?
According to Section 6 of Slae of Goods Act , which of the following correctly describes "existing goods" in a sale?
Transfer of Spes Succession is:
In a criminal case, to whom copies of judgement must be provided?
Section 9 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 defines:
Section 8 prohibits handling hazardous substances except in compliance with procedural safeguards. Which of the following matches the statutory intent?�...