Among M, N, O, P and Q sitting around a circular table facing the centre, who sits second to the right of O?
I. O sits to the immediate right of M. Only two persons were sitting between N and M.
II. Both P and O are immediate neighbours of N. Q sits second to the right of N.
In this question, we have to look after both the statements. I. As per the first statement diagram will be as follows: Now as per this diagram only I option will get eliminated as we cannot determine who sits second to the right of O as there can be two possible cases. II. As per the second statement diagram will be as follows:
Now as per this diagram, we cannot determine the person who sits second to the right of O, so the only statement 2 will get eliminated Now after both the statements getting individually eliminated we will combine both these statements and the final diagram will look like this:
By this diagram, we can say that person who sits second to the right of O will be P So, answer will be Both These Statements
What is the Minimum Holding Period (MHP) for loans with a tenor of up to 2 years before they can be transferred by the transferor?
What would be the break even units if the Fixed Cost is Rs.1,00,000 and PV ratio is 25%. The company sells its product at Rs.60 per unit.
The cost of capital for a firm _______.
According to the RBI guidelines, what should be clearly spelt out at the time of financial closure of a project financed by an NBFC?
Which of the following is/are correct regarding the liquidity ratios under BASEL-III accord defined by Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS)?
Consider the following statements regarding the financial center of Zurich:
1) Zurich is the largest city in Switzerland
2) It is a global...
An Ordinary Non-Resident Account (NRO) can be opened with:
Which of the following is/are true about the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) in India?
1)EPFO manages three schemes - the Employees...
The degree of financial leverage may be defined as:
Which of the following correctly defines the term ‘monopsony’?