Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
From statement I alone, we get, Q scored more marks than P but scored less number of marks than M and N. O, who scored second highest marks scored more number of marks than L and M. We get, N, M > Q > P We get, _ > O > _ > _ > _ > _ The final arrangement is as follows: N > O > M/L > L/M > Q > P Or N > O > M > Q > L/P > P/L So, N is the highest scorer. From statement II alone, we get, L scored more marks than P but scored less number of marks Q and N. M scored more number of marks than at least three students. We get, N, Q > L > P We get M is either highest or second highest or third highest mark scorer. Therefore, Data in statement I alone are sufficient to answer the question, while the data in statement II alone are not sufficient to answer the question.
How do you handle situations where you are required to compromise your integrity or values?
How would you describe your level of emotional intelligence?
How do you handle conflict in a relationship or group setting?
How important is it for you to feel a sense of purpose or meaning in your life?
What motivates you?
How important is it for you to be recognized and praised for your work?
Do you consider yourself a risk-taker?
Are you more of an optimist or a pessimist?
How do you handle change in your life?
How important is it for you to have a sense of purpose or meaning in your life?