Question
The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment
Act, 2016, passed by the Parliament will help in reducing the instances of child labour Below is given a passage followed by several possible inferences which can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon the degree of truth or falsity. Mark answer At first glance, the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016, passed last month in Parliament, seems progressive. It prohibits “the engagement of children in all occupations and of adolescents in hazardous occupations and processes” wherein adolescents refer to those under 18 years; children to those under 14. The Act also imposes a fine on anyone who employs or permits adolescents to work. However, on careful reading, the new Act suffers from many problems. One, it has slashed the list of hazardous occupations for children from 83 to include just mining, explosives, and occupations mentioned in the Factory Act. This means that work in chemical mixing units, cotton farms, battery recycling units, and brick kilns, among others, have been dropped. Further, even the the ones listed as hazardous can be removed, according to Section 4 — not by Parliament but by government authorities at their own discretion. Two, section 3 in Clause 5 allows child labour in “family or family enterprises” or allows the child to be “an artist in an audio-visual entertainment industry”. Since most of India’s child labour is caste-based work, with poor families trapped in intergenerational debt bondage, this refers to most of the country’s child labourers. The clause is also dangerous as it does not define the hours of work; it simply states that children may work after school hours or during vacations. Think of the plight of a 12-year-old coming home from school and then helping her mother sow umpteen collars on shirts to meet the production deadline of a contractor. When will she do her homework? How will she have the stamina to get up the next morning for school?Solution
Solution: We can’t infer if the law will definitely lead to reducing child labour.
Statements:
Some tasks are work.
All work are job.
Some job are tough
Conclusion:
I. Some tasks are tough.
- Statements:
Only Rain is Cloud
Some Star is Rainbow
A few Rainbow is Rain
Conclusions:
I. All Star can be Rain
... Two statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance...
Statement:
Each tiger is a lion.
Only a few lion are dogs.
Some dogs are cats
Conclusion:
  1. All lions are tiger...
Statement: Â Â Â Â
Only Cricket is Kabaddi.
Some Cricket is Football. Â Â Â Â
Conclusion: Â Â Â Â
I. All Cricket are ...
Statements:Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â All TVs are monitors.
                                ...
Statements: No laptop is a notebook.
All notebooks are monitors.
No monitor is a mouse.
Conclusions: I. No mouse is a monitor.
Statement : No bag is a file.
All files are folders.
Some folders are notes.
No note is a letter.
Conclusion: I. Some let...
Statements: Some bricks are hotels.
All bananas are bricks.
No apple is a brick.
Some copies are bricks.
Conclusions: I...
Statements: Some pins are mirrors. Â
All mirrors are boxes.
Conclusions:I. Some boxes are pins.Â
 II. Some boxes are mirrors.