Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Decide which of the given conclusions is/are true based on the statements
Statements:
A > Z ≥ P > M, P < R
Conclusions:
I. A > R
II. M < R
From these statements, we can infer: • A is greater than Z, Z is greater than or equal to P, and P is greater than M. • P is less than R. Now, let's evaluate the conclusions: Conclusion I: A > R • There's no direct comparison between A and R in the given statements. We cannot conclusively determine whether A is greater than R based on the given information. Conclusion II: M < R • Since P is greater than M and P is less than R, it's evident that M is less than R. This conclusion holds true based on the given statements. So, the correct answer is: 1. Only II is true.
Things done in private defence ___________________
The presumption of legitimacy under Section 112 is
Section 74 of the Contract Act lays down provisions relating to compensation for breach of contract where ______________
In consumer cases, the limitation period for filing a complaint is____________
A decree may be executed
For a defence of intoxication, to escape criminal liability, the intoxication:
The rescission of a voidable contract may be communicated or revoked in the same manner, and subject to the same rules, as apply to the ________________
Which Article of the Constitution talks about directive principles of State policy for protection of wildlife?
When did the Exim bank Act came into force?
Any person aggrieved by an order of the Board made before the commencement of the Securities Laws (Second Amendment) Act, 1999 may prefer an appeal to ...
