Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Statement: India is a country of multiple languages. Conclusion I: All Indians can speak multiple languages. This conclusion assumes that because India is a country of multiple languages, all Indians can speak multiple languages. However, the statement does not imply that every individual in India can speak multiple languages, just that the country itself has multiple languages. Therefore, Conclusion I does not logically follow from the statement. Conclusion II: Every country has multiple languages. This conclusion generalizes the specific information about India to all countries. The statement only provides information about India and does not mention or imply anything about the linguistic diversity of other countries. Therefore, Conclusion II does not logically follow from the statement either. Given these analyses, the correct answer is: 2. Neither conclusion I nor II follows
Which of the following is a bacterial disease?
Which of the following are examples of macro minerals?
The phenomenon of splitting white light into its component colors is called:
Which of the following is not a purpose of transpiration?
What is the law of reflection?
Natural radioactivity was discovered by
Which type of tissue in humans transports oxygen to the body's cells?
Before X-ray examination (coloured X-ray) of the stomach, patients are given suitable salt of barium because
When body is accelerated:
What is the atomic number of carbon?