Get Started with ixamBee
Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Statement: India is a country of multiple languages. Conclusion I: All Indians can speak multiple languages. This conclusion assumes that because India is a country of multiple languages, all Indians can speak multiple languages. However, the statement does not imply that every individual in India can speak multiple languages, just that the country itself has multiple languages. Therefore, Conclusion I does not logically follow from the statement. Conclusion II: Every country has multiple languages. This conclusion generalizes the specific information about India to all countries. The statement only provides information about India and does not mention or imply anything about the linguistic diversity of other countries. Therefore, Conclusion II does not logically follow from the statement either. Given these analyses, the correct answer is: 2. Neither conclusion I nor II follows
Two cars A and B are running at velocities of 60km per hour and 45 km per hour. What is the relative velocity of car A with respect to car B, if both ar...
Cryogenics is a branch of Physics that deals with what?
The direction of magnetic field inside a magnet is
In circular motion the direction of velocity changes at _______ points.
Which of the following pairs of phenomena illustrate the particle nature of the electromagnetic radiation?
A galvanometer coil has a resistance of 14 Ω and the metre shows full scale deflection for a current of 4 mA. How will you convert the metre into a vo...
The order of wavelengths for ordinary light is:
The colour of sky appears blue due to –
Which of the following particles in motion, having the same kinetic energy, has the shortest wavelength?
In an experimental arrangement of a Fresnel's biprism, monochromatic light of wavelength 2. is used to produce interference fringe pattern. On introduc...
