Question
Statements: Some elephants are fishes.
No fish is a tiger. All deer are tigers. Conclusions: I. Some elephants are deer. II. No elephant is a tiger. III. No deer is a fish. Three statements are given followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.Solution
The correct answer is A
What is the entitlement of an agent in the absence of any contract to the contrary?
Which of the following is completely prohibited under Muslim law?
Under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, an agreement is declared void if its consideration or object is:
How can ratification occur in a contract of agency?
Which of the following statements regarding a pawnee is correct?
A general lien as per section 171 of the Contract Act can be exercised by whom?
Which statement accurately reflects the definition and legal effect of a "contract of indemnity" under Section 124 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872?
Under Section 2(a) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which of the following best describes the essence of a proposal in contract law?
Which of the following is not a valid reason for the termination of an agency?
Under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which of the following transactions would NOT be rendered void as an agreement in restraint of trade?...
Relevant for Exams:
