Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
The person who joined the Company on 21 st May was 17 years old. Number of persons who joined the office after A was thrice as the number of persons who joined before the one aged 21. There were 3 persons who joined the office between the one who was aged 21 and J. J and C joined the company in the same month.
There were 4 persons who joined the company between H and the one who was aged 35 years old G was aged twice as that of E who joined the office just after H
I joined the office just after F.F joined the company on a 23 rd . D joined immediately before G (simulataneoulsy not possible so this CASE 1 is eleminated.)
The number of persons, who joined before I, was equal to the number of persons who joined after the one who was aged 29 years. 15. E was elder to I and they were born in consecutive years. The eldest person was 44 years old.G was aged twice as that of E
So the final arrangement is
A magistrate may not remand the accused to police custody for
Which of the following is not required for the liability of a master to arise for a servant's actions?
Which of the statement is correct relating to Article 32 of the Constitution of India?
What does the legal maxim Qui Facit Per Alium Facit Per Se imply in the context of the law of agency?
As oer the According to the the Central Vigilance Commission Act the ____________________ may make rules with respect to the number of members of the st...
As per section 167 of the Companies Act, 2013, the office of a director shall become vacant in which of the following cases?
(a) Disqualified un...
In Section 2(10) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the definition of gender now encompasses ________________.
In computing the period of limitation for filing a suit the day on which it is reckoned ______.
When a fact is said to be “Not proved” as per Indian Evidence Act?
When a suit has been duly instituted, within what time frame can a summons be issued to the defendant to appear and answer the claim?