Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
P was born in July. Q’s birthday is before N. Q wasn’t born in July. Birthdays of both Q and N are in the same month. Therefore, both Q and N may have their birthdays in January, April or May. T’s birthday is immediately after N’s. The number of persons who have their birthdays between the birthdays of S and T is equal to the number of persons who have their birthdays between the birthdays of N and P. If N’s birthday is on 23 rd May or on 23 rd January, then as shown in figure, the condition of the equal no. of birthdays between S and T, and N and P won’t be met.(refer to the below table)
The number of persons who have their birthdays between the birthdays of S and T is equal to the number of persons who have their birthdays between the birthdays of N and P. R does not have birthday in May. There are three birthdays between the birthdays of R and O. Now there are two possible dates for P’s birthday u.q. 14th July and 23rdJuly. First let us assume P's birthday on 14th July-
But, the condition that there are three birthdays between the birthdays of R and O wouldn’t be met in the above arrangement. Therefore, assuming P’s birthday is on 23rd July and redrawing the table, we get-
Tort has been derived from the word_______.
The Commissioner of Food Safety for the State under Food Safety and Standards Act is appointed by
General Insurance business covers which type/s of business/es?
As per the SEBI Act the Chairperson or any board members can relinquish office after a notice period of____.
A sells a property owned by him to B and C. B and C are different buyers and have purchased the property in two unequal halves with different amount of ...
A person who finds goods belonging to another, and takes them into his custody, is subject to the same responsibility as a________________
Under limitation Act applicant includes:
Appeal to SAT under SEBI Act lies against an order of
According to Indian Partnership Act, 1932 Which of the following best describes a partnership?
Which of the following do not constitute evidence within the meaning of Section 3 of the Evidence Act?