Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Q lives on an even number floor. R, who lives on any floor below floor number 4, lives three floors away from Q and doesn’t have experience of 12 years. That means, in case (2) Q lives on floor number 6, in case (1) Q lives on floor number 4. Neither Q nor R lives on the adjacent floor of X, who lives four floors away from the one whose experience is 7 years. The number of persons living between Q and X is the same as the number of persons living below P, whose experience is 17 years. That means, in case (2) X lives on floor number 8, case (1) is not valid. Based on the above given information we have: Case (1) is not valid as the number of persons living between Q and X is the same as the number of persons living below P, whose experience is 17 years. Again, we have: V lives three floors above the one whose experience is 21 years. That means, in case (2) V lives on floor number 9, in case (2a) V lives on floor number 4. The number of persons living between V and the one whose experience is 26 years is one more than the number of persons living between the one whose experience is 12 years and W. The experience of X is neither 26 nor 14 years. W lives on any floor above the one whose experience is 12 years but not adjacent to Q’s floor. W doesn’t live on the topmost floor. That means, in case (2) the one whose experience is 12 years lives on floor number 1, case (2a) is not valid. Based on the above given information we have:
Case (2a) is not valid as W lives on any floor above the one whose experience is 12 years but not adjacent to Q’s floor and W doesn’t live on the topmost floor. Again, we have: The one whose experience is 14 years lives two floors away from S. U has less experience than T. The number of persons living between S and Q is the same as between S and the one whose experience is 9 years. Since, persons whose experiences are in common multiple are not living on the adjacent floor. This, the experience of S is 13 years. Based on the above given information we have
A invested Rs. 3X in a business. After four months B Joined him with Rs. 3X and A double his investment. If at the end of the years total profit ...
A and B together started a business with initial investment in the ratio of 2:3, respectively. The time-period of investment for A and B is in the ratio...
Armaan began a business with an initial investment of Rs. 2400. After 8 months, Bhuvan entered the business with an amount such that Armaan's investment...
'Ashish' started a business by investing Rs.15,000. 'm' months later, 'Arjun' joined him by investing Rs. 10,000. 4 months after joining the business, '...
Sonia and Isha started a business with investments of Rs. 3100 and Rs. 2300, respectively. Four months into the business, Jai joined them with an invest...
Brahma, Vishnu and Mahesh invested money in the ratio of 1/2:1/3:1/4 in a business. After 4 months, Brahma doubled his investment and after 6 months, Vi...
Anuj and Bheem began a business by investing Rs. Z and Rs. (Z + 2,500), respectively. After operating together for 16 months, Anuj withdrew from the bus...
A, B and C invested in a business in the ratio 6:8:9. If B invested for a period whose numerical value is 112.5% of B’s investment but A and C inv...
M and N started a business by investing Rs.5000 and Rs.6000 respectively. After 6 months, M and N increased their investments by 40% and Rs.2000 respect...
A and B started a business with investments in the ratio 5:4 respectively. After 4 months, C joined them with an investment 50% more than the inv...