Continue with your mobile number
We have, Y is three persons senior to Z. Only one person is designated between Z and W. From the above condition, there are two possibilities Again we have, More than two persons are designated between W and X, who is junior to Y. As many persons designated between Y and X is same as between U and Z. V is two persons junior to T. As many persons senior to T is same as junior to W. From the above conditions, case S and case Ia get eliminated. Hence case II shows the final arrangement.
Hence case II shows the final arrangement.
While releasing the offenders after admonition under The Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, which of the following fact need not be taken into considerat...
As per section 3 of the Competition Act no enterprise or association of enterprises or person or association of persons shall enter into any agreement ...
It was held by the Court in the case of ________ “it is not for litigant to dictate to the Court as to how the proceedings should be conducted, it is ...
Which Schedule of the Constitution of India prescribe Forms of Oaths and Affirmations?
During re-examination of a witness:
When a Food Safety Officer takes a sample of food for analysis, he shall divide the sample into ……….. parts
As per the Judgment in case of Keshavananda Bharti clause (4) of Art. 13 of the constitution in relation to Art. 368 has been______
If A is unable to give sureties required u/s 436 of the Criminal Procedure Code, in spite of one whole week time given, police officer will:
If an instrument involves multiple distinct matters, how is the duty calculated under the Maharashtra Stamp Act?
Which section of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 deals with Refreshing memory?