P has more pets than Q but fewer than T, indicating T has more pets than P and Q. R has fewer pets than Q, placing R possibly at the lowest or just below Q in the count. S is not the one with the most pets, leaving T as the only option not disqualified from having the most pets. Therefore, T has the most pets.
Two statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered I & II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with comm...
Three statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at varia...
Some mobiles may not be papers. Some dusters are not calculators
Statement:
Some rivers are hills.
All hills are mountains.
No mountain is a tree.
Some trees are branches.
Conclus...
Statements: Some documents are files.
All books are folders.
No file is a folder.
Conclusions: I. No folder is ...
Some diaries are not pencils. All notebooks are papers. Some diaries are not notebooks
Statements: Only cars are motorcycles.
No motorcycle is a bike.
Some bikes are scooters.
All scooters are jeeps.
Concl...
Statement:
Some P are Q
Only a few R are S.
Only a few S are T.
Only S are P.
Conclusio...
Statement :
No mobiles is a charger.
Some chargers are not phones.
No phone is a bell.
Conclusion :
I. No mobile...
Statements: All trains are buses.
All buses are cars.
All cars are bikes.
Conclusions:...
