Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
We have: B is only daughter of F, who is married to D’s only daughter. Since, F is married to D’s only daughter, that means F must be father of B. D’s gender is opposite to F.G is brother-in-law of D and is unmarried member of the family, that means D must be married to G’s brother. Let’s say (1) is brother of G and F is married to (2). C and B are unmarried member of the family and are off opposite gender. Based on above given information we have: Again, we have: D sits third to left of B. Since, C is unmarried member of the family, thus C can’s be (1) & (2) at any possible condition. Only two married couples are there in the family. E is the daughter of H, since B is only daughter of F, thus F and H can’s be married. Either both or none of the parent is alive, that means H must be father of E and is married to D. C is an immediate neighbor of C’s father and C’s mother. C and E doesn’t sit together, that means C is not the child of E. If C is the son of F then A should be Mother of C but, Two person sits between C’s father and A from this statement C is also not a son of F, thus only possible condition is C is son of H. Since, gender of C and B are different, thus C must be brother of E. That means we have two possible position of C, in case (1) C sits immediate left of D, in case (2) C sits immediate right of D. Based on above given information we have:
Again, we have: Only three person sits between E’s brother and F, that means in case (2) F sits facing C and case (1) is not valid. Two person sits between C’s father and A. E’s son and E doesn’t sit together, since only two remaining person are E and G, thus E must be mother of A. Based on above given information we have:
Case (1) is not valid as only three person sits between E’s brother and F.
Given statement shows the relation between different elements followed by two conclusions.
Statement: B2 = T4 < E3 ≤ G5 > F6 = H7 > Q8
...Statements:
C © S * R, U % R $ Z
Conclusions:
I. Z $ C
II. U % S
III. U © C
Statements: N & C, C # I, I @ L, L % Y
Conclusions: I. C & Y II. L # N
...Statements: H < I; J < L < K; H ≥ L > M
Conclusions:
I. J < I
II. M < K
III. K > I
Which of the following does not make J @ K and R # K definitely not true?
Three statements, showing relationship between different elements, are followed by three conclusions (I). (II) and (III). Assuming the statements to be ...
Which of the following will be definitely true if the given expression L > M ≥ N > O ≥ P > Q = S ≤ T > R ≤ U is definitely not true?
Statements:
E = F > Q = A > B; J < Z ≤ A
Conclusions:
I. Q > Z
II. B ˃ J
Statement: A≤B ≤C>D ; E<D ;F>E
Conclusions:
I. D>A
II. E<C
In the question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the conclusion (s) among given three conclusions is/are definitely true and th...