Three persons sit between E and the one who works in company F. K sits third to the left of the one who works in company F. Two persons sit between K and S, who does not work in company F. Case 1 will be dropped because two persons sit between K and S, who does not work in company F. U sits third to the left of S. Neither S nor U is an immediate neighbour of E. The one who works in company P sits second to the right of T. M sits immediate right of the one who works in company P. The one who works in company H sits fourth to the right of J. The one who works in company W sits immediate right of A. Case 2A will be dropped because the one who works in company W sits immediate right of A. Case 2B will be dropped because A and J are not immediate neighbours. As many persons sit between L and the one who works in company R is same as the persons sit between L and the one who works in company Q. Immediate neighbour of K neither works in company R nor works in company Q. The one who works in company I sits immediate right of the one who works in company Q. As many persons sit between the one who works in company B and the one who works in company R is as same as the number of persons sit between the one who works in company Z and the one who works in company W. The one who works in company Z and the one who works in company W are not immediate neighbours.
A financial creditor either by itself or jointly with other financial creditors, or any other person on behalf of the financial creditor, as may be noti...
All persons are competent to testify as witnesses subject to which of the following conditions?
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 lays down that an act endangering sovereignty, unity and integrity of India shall be punished with_______________
The council of Ministers in a Parliamentary type of Government can remain in office till it enjoys the support of the
The judgement passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Hardeep Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2014) 3 SCC 92, deals with:-
As per Partnership Act, A minor :
Which of the following features is not found in an LLP?
The defendant has to file his written statement within 30 days from _______.
If at the adjourned meeting also, a quorum is not present within half-an-hour from the time appointed for holding meeting ____________________
Section 114 of Evidence Act provides for which of the following?