Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
We have, V sits second to the left of T, Two persons are sitting between T and U, R and U are sitting adjacent to each other, From the above condition, there are three possibilities. Again we have, The number of persons sitting between T and R is the same as between T and S From the above condition case-1 gets eliminated.
Again we have, Q sits exactly in the middle of P and R, R sits fifth to the left of S, P does not sits third to the right of U. Not more than one person sits between Q and R. From the above condition case-2 gets eliminated. Case-1a shows the final arrangement.
Given statement shows the relation between different elements followed by two conclusions.
Statement: B2 = T4 < E3 ≤ G5 > F6 = H7 > Q8
...Statements:
C © S * R, U % R $ Z
Conclusions:
I. Z $ C
II. U % S
III. U © C
Statements: N & C, C # I, I @ L, L % Y
Conclusions: I. C & Y II. L # N
...Statements: H < I; J < L < K; H ≥ L > M
Conclusions:
I. J < I
II. M < K
III. K > I
Which of the following does not make J @ K and R # K definitely not true?
Three statements, showing relationship between different elements, are followed by three conclusions (I). (II) and (III). Assuming the statements to be ...
Which of the following will be definitely true if the given expression L > M ≥ N > O ≥ P > Q = S ≤ T > R ≤ U is definitely not true?
Statements:
E = F > Q = A > B; J < Z ≤ A
Conclusions:
I. Q > Z
II. B ˃ J
Statement: A≤B ≤C>D ; E<D ;F>E
Conclusions:
I. D>A
II. E<C
In the question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the conclusion (s) among given three conclusions is/are definitely true and th...