Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
There are three persons sit between O and N. The person who sits two places away from N sits fourth to the right of M. M sits neither adjacent to O nor adjacent to S. The person who sits immediate left of the vacant seat sits two places away from O. Q does not sit adjacent to O. R sits two places away from Q. The number of persons who sits between N and R is one less than the number of persons who sits between S and Q. M does not sit at the end. Q does not sits right of N.
T sits adjacent to N. This eliminates case 1a. The number of persons who sits between Q and P is same as the number of persons who sits between T and O. This eliminates case 1 and 1a. so final case-2 Case-2
Which of the following statements are correct ?
1. Speaker may permit any Member to address the House his/her mother tongue, if he/she cannot ade...
Consider the following statements with respect to Preamble of the Constitution of India:
1. The Preamble is based on the 'Objective Resolution' m...
Match the following stadiums with their alternate names:
With which of the elections is the Election Commission of India not concerned?
The S.R. Bommai Case (1994) is associated with which constitutional provision?
Which article of the Indian Constitution deals with the power of the President in the context of preventive detention?
Which of the following statements about the powers of the Rajya Sabha is correct?
I. The Rajya Sabha cannot vote on the Demands for Grants.
<...The Attorney General of India has the right to audience in which of the following courts?
Who serves as the Chairman of the Inter-State Council in India?
Under which Article of the Indian Constitution can High Courts declare laws unconstitutional if they violate Fundamental Rights?