Continue with your mobile number
STEP I: Only one person sits between H and A who sits third from the one of the ends of the row. As per this statement, there will be four possible cases and the arrangement will look like this: Case-2
STEP II: D sits to the immediate left of H. As per this statement, CASE I will get eliminated and we will continue with CASE I (A), CASE II and CASE II (A) and the arrangement will look like this:
STEP III: F sits third to the left of G. F does not sit at the end of the row. As per this statement, CASE I (A) will get eliminated and we will continue with CASE II and CASE II (A) and the arrangement will look like this:
STEP IV: C sits three places away from G.Asperthisstatement, CASEII willgeteliminatedandwewillcontinuewith CASEII(A) andthe arrangementwilllook like this:
STEP V: More than three persons sit between B and A. As per this statement, the final arrangement will look like this:
The issue of shares by a company on a discount is prohibited and thus, it shall be ____________
How are Judges of the Supreme Court appointed and what is their term of office as per the Constitution?
According to the principle of marshalling by a subsequent purchaser, if an owner mortgages two or more properties to one person and later sells one or m...
The Central Government shall, by notification, appoint a Director in the Serious Fraud Investigation Office, who shall be an officer____________________...
Appeals filed before Securities Appellate Tribunal to be disposed within ___________ from the date of receipt of appeal.
Which of the following is not an example of vicarious liability?
Select the correct answer using the codes given below:
1. Any mental condition, of which any person is conscious, is a fact
2. 'A' is of u...
What is the maximum time period, under the Information Technology Act, 2000, for which a license can be suspended by the Certifying Authority?
As per the Constitutional provisions with whom does the authority to alter the boundaries of states in India lies with?
Which of the following statement regarding ‘consideration’ in a contract is false?