Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
We have, U sits opposite to the one who sits second to the left of O. Only two persons sit between K and O. K sits to the left of O. From the above condition, there are three possibilities.
Again we have, The number of persons sit to the left of U is the same as the number of persons sits to the right of Y. W sits second to the right of Y. J sits immediate left of M, none of them sits at end of the row.
Again we have, L sits opposite to the one who sits second to the left of Z. X and Y are not immediate neighbours. From the above condition, case2 and case3 get eliminated. Case1 shows the final arrangement.
Given statement shows the relation between different elements followed by two conclusions.
Statement: B2 = T4 < E3 ≤ G5 > F6 = H7 > Q8
...Statements:
C © S * R, U % R $ Z
Conclusions:
I. Z $ C
II. U % S
III. U © C
Statements: N & C, C # I, I @ L, L % Y
Conclusions: I. C & Y II. L # N
...Statements: H < I; J < L < K; H ≥ L > M
Conclusions:
I. J < I
II. M < K
III. K > I
Which of the following does not make J @ K and R # K definitely not true?
Three statements, showing relationship between different elements, are followed by three conclusions (I). (II) and (III). Assuming the statements to be ...
Which of the following will be definitely true if the given expression L > M ≥ N > O ≥ P > Q = S ≤ T > R ≤ U is definitely not true?
Statements:
E = F > Q = A > B; J < Z ≤ A
Conclusions:
I. Q > Z
II. B ˃ J
Statement: A≤B ≤C>D ; E<D ;F>E
Conclusions:
I. D>A
II. E<C
In the question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the conclusion (s) among given three conclusions is/are definitely true and th...