Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Three persons were seated between H and the one who like Green. H was seated to the left of the one who likes Green. C was seated to the immediate right of the one who likes Green. Two persons were seated between C and the one who likes Pink. F and the one who likes Pink were immediate neighbours. Two persons were seated between F and the one who likes Red. H does not like Red.
The number of persons seated to the left of the one, who likes Red was the same as between the number of persons seated to the right of the one who likes Blue. Two persons were seated between D and the one who likes Orange. Neither C nor F likes Orange.
The number of persons seated between A and the one who likes Black was the same as between E and the one who likes Orange. The one who likes White seated second to the right of A. G and the one who likes Yellow were immediate neighbours. B neither like Blue nor Yellow.
Case 1 and case 2 are invalid because the number of persons seated between A and the one who likes Black was the same as between E and the one who likes Orange. Case 3a is invalid because G and the one who likes Yellow were immediate neighbours. So, the final arrangement is
Original Jurisdiction of Supreme Court is given in Article ……… of Indian Constitution
The famous case of Balfour vs. Balfour (1919) 2 KB 571 is related to________.
Which of the statements are correct relating to the nature of shares or debentures of a company?
Which of the following is the main body of United Nations Organisation?
What is the full form of APEDA?
Who appoints the Judges of the High Court?
When mortgaged property is leased & it is renewed:
Under the LLP Act section 63 lays down that the winding up of a limited liability partnership____________
What does JECFA stands for?