Two persons were seated between P and M’s father and neither of them attends the seminar in November. The one who was seated second to the left of P attend the seminar in May. M and his father were immediate neighbours. Two persons were seated between M and the one who attend the seminar in September. The one who attends the seminar in September is nephew to P and both were seated adjacent to each other.
O, who is the son of M was seated to the immediate right of his sister and attend the seminar after M but not immediately. Q is married to the only sister of the one who attends the seminar in June and was seated to the immediate left of M’s daughter. Two persons were seated between N and M’s wife. Q is from 1st generation. P is not the brother of M’s wife. Two persons were seated between Q and the one, who attended the seminar June. The one, who attended the seminar in May doesn’t face the one, who attended the seminar June. O and P are not neighbours. Two possibilities in blood relation.
Hence, case 1b and case 2a are invalid because O was seated to the immediate right of M’s daughter and Q was seated to the immediate left of M’s daughter. Case 2b is invalid because P cannot attend the seminar in June (possibility 2 of blood relation diagram) So, possibility 2 of blood relation diagram is invalid.
Only one female attend the seminar after June. S and her brother attend the seminar on consecutive months. Two persons attend the seminar between P and R. T attend the seminar in August.
So, the final solution is
राष्ट्रपति का आदेश 1960 का आधार कौन सा अनुच्छेद है ?
राजभाषा नीति के कार्यान्वयन और इस संबंध में समय-समय पर राज...
घाट-घाट का पानी पीना
निम्नलिखित मे से कौन सी भाषा संयुक्त राष्ट की आधिकारिक भा...
निम्नलिखित में से कौन सा सही सुमेलित युग्म नहीं है ?
हि...
TOLIC का सही विस्तार बताये?
AREA के लिए सही हिन्दी पारिभाषिक शब्द है
संसदीय राजभाषा समिति की किस उप-समिति द्वारा बैंकों का निर...
दिए गए अंग्रेजी शब्दों के लिए एक हिन्दी पर्याय का चयन कीजि...
राजभाषा की दृष्टि से भारत के राज्य कितने वर्गों में विभक्...