Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Imposing a ban on fire crackers is not the ONLY way to ensure a control in pollution levels as it is also mentioned in the statement that this has been done as a test to check if the pollution levels fall. Thus I is not implicit. Nothing about development or other states following the trend is relevant to the ban on sale of fire crackers. Hence, II is not implicit. Assumption III tells whether it will be easy or difficult to impose a ban on the crackers and the fact that stocks have already been produced. It is not something that the reader will assume on the basis of the given statement thus. III is not implicit. Since the ban is temporary, there are chances of its upliftment. Hence IV is implicit.
With reference to the Government portal UDID (Unique Disability ID), consider the following statements:
1. Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerme...
Consider the following Statements about Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Package Insurance Scheme and choose the option with correct Statements.
Consider the following Statements about Mission Indradhanush and choose the option with correct Statements.
Consider the following Statements.
(i) Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY) wa launched in 2016.
(ii) The scheme is being implemented ...