Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Conclusion I is valid because the statement mentions that every year, floods in Chennai result in a large number of people becoming homeless. Since heavy rainfall is the primary cause of floods, this conclusion is logical. However, Conclusion II is incorrect, as it is not referenced anywhere in the given statement. A state can have an adequate number of dams and barrages yet still face flooding. Hence, the correct answer is (A).
How is R related to P?
N, O, Q, R, S and T are seven members in a family. N is married to Q, who has two children, O and R. T is the only son of S, who is sister- in- law of R...
Prashant Arora has three children - Sangeeta, Vimal and Ashish. Ashish married Monika, the eldest daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Roy. The Roys married their y...
If R has only one child and there are four male members in the family then how is the child of R related to Y?
Y is the daughter of H, who is married to Z. W is the son of Z, who is the father of V. V is not a female. How many girl child does H have?
How is O related to A?
How N related to M?
Statement: P ≥ Q ≥ R = S > T, U > V = W ≤ R
Conclusion: I. R ≥ U II. U > S
...R's brother T, is the grandfather of V's son. How is T related to V if V has no siblings?
How D is related to E?