Question
Statement: Some mad are sad. Only a few
sad are bad. All bad are lad. No lad is dad.    All dad are gad.  Conclusions: All sad may be lad. All lad can be gad. Some mad can be lad. Some dad being bad is a possibility. In each of the question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.ÂSolution
Some sad are bad (I) + All bad are lad (A) → Some sad are lad (I) → Probable conclusion → All sad may be lad (A). Hence conclusion I follows. No lad is dad (E) + All dad are gad (A) → Some gad are not lad (O) → Probable conclusion → All lad may be gad (A). Hence conclusion II follows. Some sad are bad (I) + All bad are lad (A) → Some sad are lad (I) + Some lad are bad (I) → Probable conclusion → Some mad can be lad (I). Hence conclusion III follows. All bad are lad (A) + No lad is dad (E) → No bad is dad (E). Hence conclusion IV does not follow. Alternate Method -
As per S.9 of CPC, courts should try all suits of a civil nature _________________________.
Which of the following is an example of fair use under copyright law?
An appeal from the order of the Central Authority shall lie to?
Which of the following is not the function of the Authority under the Airports Authority of India Act?
Trademark is represented by:
A. @
B. ©
C. â„¢
D. ®
According to the Insurance Act when Administrator for management of insurance business may be appointed by the Authority?
Under the provisions of Code 76 of the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020, what happens if a worker is entitled to more favo...