Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Some whys are where (I) + All where are who’s (A) = Some whys are who’s.(I) ⇒ conversion ⇒ Some who’s are whys.(I) Hence, conclusion I will follow. A + I = No conclusion. Hence, neither conclusion II nor III follows. However, Conclusion II and III make a complementary pair, hence, either conclusion II or III follows. Alternative method:
A fact not otherwise relevant becomes relevant under s.11 of the Indian Evidence Act, on the grounds of _________?
What is the tenure for which an additional director is appointed under the Companies Act?
The official document entitling the holder to a ration of food issued by the government of India is known as____________
Who shall constitute the Cyber Regulations Advisory Committee under section 88 of the Information Technology Act, 2000?
The Companies Act, 2013 was enacted on ____________
Which of the following language is not mentioned in Eighth Schedule of the Constitution of India?
In the case of Supreme Court Advocates on-Record Association and another Vs Union of India which of the following amendment to the constituti...
Which kind of hurt is not a grievous hurt?
Right to property is a ___?
Under Section 468 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 1973- the period of limitation for taking cognizance in case of the offence is punishable with imp...