In the following question, two statements are given each followed by two conclusions I, II & III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statements :
I. Some letters are paper.
II. All papers are objects.
III. Some objects are subjects.
Conclusion:
I. Some papers are not subjects.
II. All subjects are objects.
All papers are objects (A) + Some objects are subjects (I) ⇒ No conclusion. Hence, conclusion I does not follow. Some objects are subjects (I) ⇒ Conversion ⇒ Some subjects are objects (I). Hence conclusion II does not follow. Alternative Method: Conclusion I: Not necessarily true based on given venn diagram. Conclusion II: Not necessarily true based on given venn diagram. Hence, option (4) is the correct answer.
Under the Competition Act, 2002 the Chairperson, if for any reason, is unable to attend a meeting of the Commission, the _______________ present at the ...
A agrees, in writing, to sell a horse to B for “Rs. 1,000 or Rs. 1,500”.
For a revocation to be effective when should it be made?
All sums realised by way of penalties under the SEBI Act shall be credited to the __________________
According to Sales of Goods Act, 1930 “ mercantile agent ” means a mercantile agent having in the customary course of business as such
Who is a sub-agent______________________________
The decision in the case of R Vs. Bedingfield was overruled in the case of ?
Who shall constitute the committee of creditors as per section 21 of the IBC?
To be a member of the House of People, minimum age prescribed is:
When is there an abuse of dominant position as per the Competition Act?