Question
Statements: No bold is a smart. Some smarts are
cowards. Conclusions: I. Some bolds are not cowards. II. Some smarts are not bolds. In each question below are given two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Give Answer:Solution
No bold is a smart (E) + Some smarts are cowards (I) = Some cowards are not bolds (O*). But (O) cannot be reversed. Hence, conclusion I will not follow. No bold is a smart (E) ⇒ Conversion ⇒ No smart is a bold(E). ⇒ I.I. ⇒ Some smarts are not bolds (O). Hence, conclusion II will follow.
P referably, the ‘Holocaust’ law has strike a major convention with international reverberations.
...Below are given some sentences (1), (2), (3), (4) and (5). All the sentences represent the same idea expressed in different ways. You have to choose th...
Diplomatic tensions have ensured that the two nations competing against each other only in global events.
Select the phrase from the options below that should replace the underlined phrase in the sentence to make it grammatically and contextually correct. I...
The market responded negatively to the results, as concerned about the bank’s asset quality and shrinking net interest margin (NIM) weighed on investo...
In each of the questions given below, four words are given in bold. These four words may or may not be in their correct position. The sentence is then ...
In the sentence given below four words have been printed in bold which are numbered (1), (2), (3) and (4) One of these words may be misspelt or inappro...
Rearrange the parts of the sentence in correct order.
P. by the Indian Army
Q.in Infantry and Armoured Corps
R. several women offic...
Select the most appropriate option to substitute the underlined segment in the given sentence. If there is no need to substitute it, select ‘No substi...
His lawyer told him he could not understand why the Justice Department would bring up a charge on the technicality of one misdated check.
Relevant for Exams:
