Statements: Some nails are hairs.
No eye is an ear.
All hairs are eyes.
Conclusions: I. All nails may be eyes.
II. Some nails may not be eyes.
For conclusion I, second statement is not required, because we find a common term ‘hair’ in the first and the third statement. Some nails are hairs (I) + All hairs are eyes (A) = Some nails are eyes (I) ⇒ Probable conclusions ⇒ All nails may be eyes (A) and Some nails may not be eyes(O). Hence, both conclusion I and II follow.
As per the Companies Act, 2013 a Company means_____________
Who among the following is not entitled to claim maintenance under section 125 of Cr.P.c?
Who among the following is the propounder of the “pigeon- hole” theory?
What is the enactment date of the IRDA Act, 1999?
As per the Insurance Act, 1938 an insurance company shall not be wound up voluntarily except _________________
Where there is an unconditional contract for the sale of specific goods in a deliverable state, the property in the goods passes to the buyer
The procedure for summary trial is provided in the following sections of Cr.P.C :
In case of a transfer of dwelling house by one of the co-owners______.
According to Section 5of the IRDA Act, what is the tenure of office for the Chairperson and other whole-time members?
What is the word for "a person who is fluent in two languages"?