Question
. Statements: Some ovens are microwaves.
Only a few microwaves are toasters No oven is a grinder Conclusions: I. All ovens is being toaster is a possibility II. Some microwaves are not grinders III. No grinder is a toaster In each of the questions below are given some statements followed by some Conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even, if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
Some ovens are microwaves (I) + Only a few microwaves are toasters (I) β Probable conclusion β All ovens may be toasters (A). Hence conclusion I follows. Some ovens are microwaves (I) β Conversion β Some microwaves are ovens (I) + No oven is a grinder (E) β Some microwaves are not grinders (O). Hence conclusion II follows. Some ovens are microwaves (I) + Only a few microwaves are toasters (I) β No conclusion. Hence conclusion III does not follow.
A surrogate key is:
Which analytics type is focused on predicting future outcomes?
In a snowflake schema of a data warehouse, which of the following consequences is most likely as a result of normalization of dimension tables?
Which SQL query will correctly calculate the average salary of employees in each department and group them by department in a table named 'employees'?
Which of the following best describes a fact constellation schema in a data warehouse?
Which of the following commands is part of the Transaction Control Language (TCL) in SQL?
Which of these is NOT an ensemble method?
Which of the following best describes the primary function of a database index?
What is meant by 'cardinality' in data modeling?
In the context of a relational database, which of the following is NOT a characteristic of a candidate key ?