In the question below some statements are given followed by four conclusions I, II, III and IV. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the statements and then decide which of the given conclusion definitely follows from the given statements, disregarding the commonly known facts.
Statements:
Few Facebook is Snapchat.
All Instagram is Snapchat.
No Instagram is Twitter.
All Twitter is Telegram.
Conclusions:
I. Some Telegram is not Instagram.
II. Some Facebook is Instagram.
III. No Twitter is Snapchat.
IV. Some Instagram is not Telegram.
No Instagram is Twitter (E) + All Twitter is Telegram (A) → Some Telegram is not Instagram (O*). Hence conclusion I follows but conclusion IV does not follow. Few Facebook is Snapchat (I) + [All Instagram is Snapchat (A) → Conversion] → Some Snapchat is Instagram (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow. All Instagram is Snapchat (A) → Conversion → Some Snapchat is Instagram (I) + No Instagram is Twitter (E) → Some Snapchat is not Twitter (O). Hence conclusion III does not follow.
In the case of cost-push inflation, other things being equal:
In a frequency distribution the last cumulative frequency is 500. Q3 must lie in?
When the share of output going to capital is 0.25, the share going to labor is 0.75, output increases 4%, labor increases 1%, and capital increases 2%, ...
Judging from the figure, a person that chooses to consume bundle C is likely to