Question
In the question below some statements are given
followed by three conclusions I II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion definitely follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some plants are flowers No petal are flowers Some stems are petal Conclusions: I. Some stems are not flowers II. Some plants are not petal III. All petal being plants is a possibilitySolution
Some stems are petal (I) + No petal are flowers (E) → Some stems are not flowers (O). Hence conclusion I follows. Some plants are flowers (I) + [No petal are flowers (E) → Conversion] → No flowers is petal (E) → Some plants are not petals (O). Hence conclusion II follows. Some plants are flowers (I) + [No petal are flowers (E) → Conversion] → No flowers is petal (E) → Some plants are not petals (O) → Probable conclusion → All petal may be plants (I). Hence conclusion III follows.
Who/ Which among the following is not a subject of International law?
A. State
B. UNO
C. Refugees
D. WTO.
According to Prof. Dicey, what are the three meanings or principles of the Rule of Law?
a.   Supremacy of Law
b.   Equality b...
What is the notice period for the Annual General Meeting of a company?
As per the Motor vehicles Act, who is considered as a "driver," especially when one motor vehicle is towing another?
An appeal shall lie from a decree order made by the court of small causes Mumbai:
In which circumstance can a Government security be held in the name of a public office as per the Government Securities Act?
After dissolution every partner has a right to restrain___
Under the provisions of The Specific Relief Act, 1963, when a part of a contract which, taken by itself, can and ought to be specifically performed, sta...
In the event of occurrence of any vacancy in the office of the Presiding Officer of the Securities Appellate Tribunal by reason of his death, resignatio...
Whether court has power to refer a dispute for arbitration when it is ongoing before it?