Question
Statements: Some dogs are cats. No camel is a
rat. All cats are camels. Conclusions: I. All dogs may be camels. II. Some dogs may not be camels. In each of the questions below are given three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read both the conclusions and then decide which of given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Give answerSolution
For conclusion I, second statement is not required, because we find a common term ‘cat’ in the first and the third statement. Some dogs are cats (I) + All cats are camels (A) = Some dogs are camels (I) ⇒ Probable conclusions ⇒ All dogs may be camels (A) and Some dogs may not be camels(O). Hence, both conclusion I and II will follow.
Choose the word which is most nearly the same in meaning to the word āonusā as used in the passage.
The company's CEO decided to ____________ the new marketing campaign due to budget constraints, even though it showed promising results in initial test...
Which of the following best describes the tone of the passage?
Which of the following is the most opposite in meaningĀ to the word ā hazardousā as used in the passage?
State the antonym of āredundancyā.Ā
Which of the following statements is definitely true according to the passage?
What according to the scientists was the origin of the oil?Ā
The desert plants face the danger of _____ from extreme aridity and extreme altitude
Which of the following words seems to be the most opposite in meaning to the word 'bluff' as used in the passage ?
Find the word from the given options which has its meaning most similar to the word sequestration as used in the passage.