Three statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statement:
Some Fighter are Trainers.
All Trainers are Pilot.
No Trainer is a Soldier.
Conclusions:
(I) Some Pilot are not Soldier.
(II) All Soldier being Fighter is a possibility.
(III) No Soldier is Fighter
All Trainers are Pilot (A) → Conversion → Some Pilot are Trainers (I) + No Trainer is a Soldier (E) → Some Pilot are not Stine (O). Hence conclusion I follows. Some Fighter are Trainers (I) + No Trainer is a Soldier (E) → Some Fighter are not Soldier (O) → Probable conclusion → All Soldier may be Fighter (A). Hence conclusion II follows but conclusion III does not follow.
Which of the following combinations of person is not a married couple?
Read the directions carefully and answer the following questions.
In a family of six members, B has two children, and he is the son of A, who ...
Which of the following expression represents the relationship ‘A is daughter-in-law of J’?
Which among the following option(s) is/are definitely true?
Who is married to X?
How D is related to E?
A # B means ‘A is the sister of B’.
A @ B means ‘A is the son of B’.
A & B means ‘A is the father of B’.
A % B m...
Which of the followings is definitely true about
“H @ K % P @ S $ G”?
Who among the following person is the mother of D?
What is the relation of E with respect to G?
