Question
Three statements are given, followed by three
conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statement: Some Fighter are Trainers. All Trainers are Pilot. No Trainer is a Soldier. Conclusions: (I) Some Pilot are not Soldier. (II) All Soldier being Fighter is a possibility. (III) No Soldier is FighterSolution
All Trainers are Pilot (A) → Conversion → Some Pilot are Trainers (I) + No Trainer is a Soldier (E) → Some Pilot are not Stine (O). Hence conclusion I follows. Some Fighter are Trainers (I) + No Trainer is a Soldier (E) → Some Fighter are not Soldier (O) → Probable conclusion → All Soldier may be Fighter (A). Hence conclusion II follows but conclusion III does not follow.
Under the MSMED Act, 2006, what is the interest rate that a buyer must pay to an MSME supplier if payment is delayed beyond the agreed date?
Which of the following statements does not represent a true characteristic of a company under the Companies Act, 2013?
When the decision-making authority is completely left to the team members, it denotes which style of management?
Calculate Debtors Ratio (365 days of the year.)
Which of the following banks was established as a private sector bank in India?
1)Â Â Â Axis Bank
2)Â Â Â IDBI Bank
3)Â Â ...
What is the "Indian Banks' Association (IBA)"?
In a documentary credit transaction, what is the significance of the 'expiry date' mentioned in the letter of credit?
What does the term 'dividend yield' signify for an investor in the equity market?
Which of the following is a type of interest rate risk?
Which of the following are the benefits of a centralised risk management structure?
A.   it is independent from operations and business unit ...
Relevant for Exams:
