Question
Three statements are given, followed by three
conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statement: Some Fighter are Trainers. All Trainers are Pilot. No Trainer is a Soldier. Conclusions: (I) Some Pilot are not Soldier. (II) All Soldier being Fighter is a possibility. (III) No Soldier is FighterSolution
All Trainers are Pilot (A) → Conversion → Some Pilot are Trainers (I) + No Trainer is a Soldier (E) → Some Pilot are not Stine (O). Hence conclusion I follows. Some Fighter are Trainers (I) + No Trainer is a Soldier (E) → Some Fighter are not Soldier (O) → Probable conclusion → All Soldier may be Fighter (A). Hence conclusion II follows but conclusion III does not follow.
L @ K * J * I @ G @ H % F, How is J related to H?
Answer the following question based on the direction given below.
If 'A # B' means 'A is the son of B' 'A $ B' means 'A is the sister of B' 'A & ...
If A $ B means A is son of B, A # B means A is brother of B and A * B means A is father of B, then what does P # Q * R $ S mean?
'A # B' means 'A is the father of B'. 'A @ B' means 'A is the sister of B'. 'A & B' means 'A is the son of B'. 'A $ B' means 'A is the uncle of B'. 'A %...
How is U related to S if ‘R+S@T$W#U? V’ is true?
If 'A@B' means 'A is father of B', 'A#B' means 'A is wife of B', 'A$B' means 'A is sister of B', 'A%B' means 'A is brother of B'. If 'R @ S $ T # V @ U ...
Read the following logic and answer the given question.
A @ B means A is the husband of B.
A # B means A is the wife of B
A $ B men...
‘W + X’, means ‘W is the sister of X’
‘W - X’, means ‘W is the daughter of X’
‘W × X’, means ‘W is the brother...
- 'A $ B' means 'A is the daughter-in-law of B'. 'A % B' means 'A is the father of B'. 'A & B' means 'A is married to B'. 'A # B' means 'B is the brother of ...
If L is mother of M’s father then which of the following is true?
Relevant for Exams:
