Question
. In the questions given below there are three
statements followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Only carrot is pumpkin. Some carrots are cabbages. Some cabbages are cauliflowers. Conclusion: I. Some pumpkins are cauliflowers. II. Some carrots are cauliflowers. III. No pumpkin is cabbage.Solution
Only carrot is pumpkin β All pumpkins are carrots and pumpkins cannot have any positive relation with anyone. Hence conclusion I does not follow but conclusion III follows. Some carrots are cabbage (I) + Some cabbages are cauliflowers (I) β No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow.
What is the time period by which the Adjudicating Authority may by order extend the duration of corporate insolvency resolution process beyond one hundr...
Estoppel can be
The power of court to convert summons- cases into warrant- cases apply to an offence punishable with imprisonment
Where no provision is made by contract between the partners for the determination of their partnership, the partnership is-
Who is empowered to delegate any of its powers or functions under the Companies Act, 2013 other than the power to make rules, to any other authority or ...
Which of the following Fundamental Rights is available to both the citizens and non-citizens?
Section 74 of the Contract Act lays down provisions relating to compensation for breach of contract where ______________
The corporate insolvency resolution process shall be completed _______________ from the date of admission of the application to initiate such process
According to Section 178 of the Companies Act, what is the composition requirement for the Nomination and Remuneration Committee of a listed public com...
What is the maximum number of directors in a public company?