In the question below some statements are given followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion definitely follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements:
Some Lawns are Prawns.
All Prawns are Fishes.
No Fish is Whale.
Conclusions:
I. Some Prawns are Fish.
II. Some Lawns are Whale.
III. No Whale is Prawn.
All Prawns are Fish (A) →I.I. → Some Prawns are Fishes (I). Hence conclusion I follows. Some Lawns are Prawns (I) + All Prawns are Fishes (A) → Some Lawns are Fishes (I) + No Fish is Whale (E) → Some Lawns are not Whale (O). Hence conclusion II does not follows. All Prawns are Fishes (A) + No Fish is Whale (E) → No Prawns is Whale (E) → Conversion → No Whale is Prawns (E). Hence conclusion III follows.
The curie law, x = C/T, expressing susceptibility x varying with absolute temperature T, is obeyed by:
A porter lifts luggage of 20 kg from the ground and puts it on his head 2 m above the ground. Calculate the work done by him on the luggage (take g = 10...
What process causes white light to split into its constituent colors?
The unit 'Weber' is associated with which of the following?
Why does a fountain pen leak on an airplane flying at high altitude?
Which law states that internal energy is a function of state and the increase in internal energy equals the sum of heat supplied to the system and work ...
What is the magnitude of magnetic force per unit length on a wire carrying a current of 10 A and making an angle of 30° with the direction of a unif...
Which of the following is not a recognized type of inertia?
What is the electrical charge of a neutrino?
Which of the following is not an insulator?