In the given question, three statements are given each followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statements:
Some rays are lights.
Some lights are bulbs.
All bulbs are fans.
Conclusions:
I. All lights being fans is a possibility.
II. Some bulbs are rays.
Some lights are bulbs (I) + All bulbs are fans (A) → Some lights are fans (I) → Conversion → Some fans are lights (I) → Probable conclusion → All lights may be fans (A). Hence conclusion I follows. Some rays are lights (I) + Some lights are bulbs (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow.
The Rent controller shall be not below the rank of:
According to the Legal Services Authority Act the _________ may constitute a Committee, to be called the Taluk Legal Services Committee, for each taluk ...
The endorsement made on the document admitted in evidence shall be signed or initialed by
In the context of insurance policies, who does the term "policy-holder" include as per the Insurance Act?
Article 20 of Constitution of India speaks about:
In which of the following reports, the Law Commission recommended the “Breakdown Principle” to be accepted as the additional ground for divorce:
Under order 8 rule 6 C.P.C. set-off may be permitted if
Which of the following is not an example of a public trust doctrine?
An agent ____________ personally enforce contracts entered into by him on behalf of his principal, nor is he personally bound by them
The terms "Pledge", "Pawnor" and "Pawnee" has been defined under which section of the Contract Act?
