Question
In the following question below are given some
statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements: All Tables are Chairs. Some Tables are Desks. Conclusions: I. Some Desks are not Chairs. II. Some Chairs are Desks. III. All Chairs are Tables.Solution
Some Tables are Desks (I) → Conversion → Some Desks are Tables (I) + All Tables are Chairs (A) → Some Desks are Chairs (I) → Conversion → Some Chairs are Desks (I). Hence conclusion I does not follow but conclusion II follows. All Tables are Chairs (A) → Conversion → Some Chairs are Tables (I). Hence conclusion III does not follow.
Which section of the IPC delas with limit of solitary confinement?
All of the following are sources of administrative law, EXCEPT:
The Indian Contract Act is based on the principle of _____________
What does Section 15K of the relevant Act state regarding the establishment of the Securities Appellate Tribunal?
With reference to the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, in which of the following cases Supreme Court stated as under "There is a presumption that a civil...
Quid Pro Quo means_____________________
What is required of every recognized stock exchange in terms of reporting to the Central Government as laid down under the SCRA?
Who can initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process as per IBC?
What does the Writ of Prohibition, which is used a means to exercise judicial review, mean?
According to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, unless otherwise agreed by the parties, when is a written communication deemed to have been received ...
Relevant for Exams:
