Question
In the question below some statements are given
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion definitely follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Flowers are Plants. All Plants are Herbs. No Herb is Shrub. Conclusions: I. Some Plants are Herb. II. Some Flowers are Shrub. III. No Shrub is Plant.Solution
All Plants are Herb (A) →I.I. → Some Plants are Herbs (I). Hence conclusion I follows.Some Flowers are Plants (I) + All Plants are Herbs (A) → Some Flowers are Herbs (I) + No Herb is Shrub (E) → Some Flowers are not Shrub (O). Hence conclusion II does not follows.All Plants are Herbs (A) + No Herb is Shrub (E) → No Plants is Shrub (E) → Conversion → No Shrub is Plants (E). Hence conclusion III follows.
If directed by the Act. the Court shall presume a fact as proved
Where should the payment be applied in case the debt to be discharged is not indicated as per the provisions laid down under the Contract Act?
Which of the following is a valid offer?
The Central Government, if on a representation made by the Reserve Bank in this behalf is satisfied that it is expedient so to do, may by notification i...
A lunatic is always competent to testify except when:
The choice of arbitrator rests with whom in case parties fail to decide?
Which entity is responsible for enforcing compliance under the Act?
A agrees to sell to B, for Rs. 1,000, “my white horse”. A has two white horses.
What is the primary aim of the Mischief Rule in statutory interpretation?
Which section of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 empowers the special judges to try the offence in a summary way?