Statements:
Some dogs are cats.
No camel is a rat.
All cats are camels.
Conclusions:
I. All dogs may be camels.
II. Some dogs may not be camels.
For conclusion I, second statement is not required, because we find a common term ‘cat’ in the first and the third statement. Some dogs are cats (I) + All cats are camels (A) = Some dogs are camels (I) ⇒ Probable conclusions ⇒ All dogs may be camels (A) and Some dogs may not be camels(O). Hence, both conclusion I and II will follow.
Statements: B < C ≤ D < A ≥ Y
Conclusion: I. A > B II. Y < C
...In which of the following expressions will the expression ‘M ≥ N ' and ‘Q < O’ be definitely true?
Statements: B & C, C # D, D @ E, E % F
Conclusions: I. C & F II. E # B
...Statements:
A ≥ Z > B ≥ Y; C > B ≥ W
Conclusion:
I. A > W
II. C > Y
Statement: L > J ≥ U ≥ F; P < S < L
Conclusion: I. S < F II. P < U
Which of the following symbols should be placed in the blank spaces respectively (in the same order from left to right) in order to complete the given ...
In the following question, a relationship between different elements is shown in the statements, followed by two conclusions I and II. Assuming the stat...
Statement: H > G = M > S; G `>=` T > L; M `<=` F < U
Conclusion: I. F > S II. T < H
...Statements : P > Q < R = U ≤ V = S ≤ W ≥ X > I
Conclusions :
I. Q ≥ V
II. R ≤ W
Statements: M # N # O $ P & Q % R % S
Conclusions : I. Q @ S ...