Healthcare. Something as fundamental as a human right, but access, quality, and affordability vary starkly based on where you reside. In some places, there is free medicine for all, while in others, one hospital stay can rob you of your savings. Why the huge disparity? And more importantly, can we learn from how other nations deliver healthcare?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96974/969743e6ebe53d1b85e941b8bc719040c870fe72" alt=""
This blog examines worldwide healthcare models close-up, dismantling them into plain language. No complicated slang—just a straightforward discussion on what works and what doesn’t, and how India (and other countries) can learn from them.
The Four Big Healthcare Models
Generally speaking, there are four healthcare system types throughout the world. These models aren’t set in stone—states tend to mash them up together—but they can assist in deciphering the fundamental principles.
Beveridge Model (Government-Funded Healthcare)
Consider the UK’s National Health Service (NHS). There, the government raises taxes and pays for healthcare, so it is free when you use it. Hospitals, clinics, and even some doctors work for the government.
Where it succeeds:
- Everyone has access: Wealthy or poor, you receive the same care.
- No medical bills: Citizens don’t have to pay for costly hospital visits.
Where it fails:
- Long waits to get procedures done.
- Heavy tax rate on working citizens.
Other examples: Spain, New Zealand, Cuba.
Bismarck Model (Insurance-Based System)
It was first applied in Germany, and it uses health insurance—primarily employer-sponsored, with government regulation. There are private insurance companies, but they are not-for-profit. In contrast to the US, everyone is insured, job or not.
Strengths:
- Patients enjoy choice of doctors.
- High-quality treatment with little wait time.
Weaknesses:
- Costly to sustain, since insurance premiums may increase.
- Can leave individuals uninsured if regulations are weak.
Other examples: France, Belgium, Japan.
National Health Insurance Model (A Hybrid System)
It’s a combination of the two above. Canada utilizes this system—hospitals and physicians are private, yet the majority of healthcare expenses are paid for by the government through tax-funded insurance.
Advantages:
- Coverage of the entire population without the need for government-owned hospitals.
- Lower healthcare expenses compared to strictly private systems.
Disadvantages:
- Long waiting times for non-urgent treatments.
- Government budgets may result in limitations on funds.
Other examples: Taiwan, South Korea.
Out-of-Pocket Model (Pay-as-You-Go Healthcare)
Now, this is where it gets hard. In a lot of developing nations, including most of India and Africa, healthcare is out-of-pocket. If you can pay, you get treated. If not, sometimes you don’t get treatment at all.
The cruel truth:
- Healthcare is still more of a luxury than a right.
- Most people don’t go to the hospital until it’s too late.
- Heavy financial burden on families.
Examples of countries that adopt this model are Nigeria, Afghanistan, and rural India.
What Can India Learn?
India has a combination of all these models. Free or low-cost care is offered by government hospitals (such as the Beveridge model), private insurance is expanding (like the Bismarck model), and a national insurance program (Ayushman Bharat) exists (such as Canada’s system). However, much of the population pays out-of-pocket.
So, what can we learn from other countries?
- Increased emphasis on primary healthcare – Cuba has one of the highest doctor-to-patient ratios in the world because they place a high priority on community healthcare. India requires more investment in grassroots healthcare facilities.
- Tighter controls on private hospitals – The US healthcare system is a warning. Excessive privatization without checks results in medical costs going through the roof. France demonstrates that government control can keep private healthcare affordable.
- Shorten waiting times in government hospitals – Canada and the UK have this problem. India needs to balance free health with efficiency, perhaps by learning from Singapore’s hybrid public-private model.
- Enlarge health insurance coverage – Germany guarantees every citizen is covered by health insurance and minimizes out-of-pocket payments. India’s Ayushman Bharat is in the right direction but has to cover more individuals.
Final Thoughts
No healthcare model is ever perfect. Every nation’s system would depend on its economy, politics, and social priorities. But there is something certain—universal access to affordable healthcare should be an aspiration for all nations.
India is at a juncture. It has the resources, technology, and manpower to develop a robust healthcare system, but implementation is the issue. Learning from international models, fine-tuning policies, and providing equitable access, we can develop a system that caters to all Indians, whether rich or poor, urban or rural.
The question is—are we willing to make it happen?
At ixamBee, we specialize in providing comprehensive online courses for government exams and online courses for government jobs. Our expertly designed courses for government jobs cater to a wide range of upcoming government exams. Whether you’re preparing for specific courses for government exams or seeking general guidance, ixamBee offers the resources like Beepedia previous year papers, SSC CGL, SSC CHSL, SSC MTS and other mock tests to succeed in exams like RBI Grade B, SEBI Grade A, NABARD Grade A, RRB NTPC, SSC MTS, NIACL Assistant, and more.